My idea, the hyperloop, needs Eurasian standards for an EU-EAEU-ASEAN-PRC network

I think the title of this blog entery says it all. There needs to be a Eurasian standard for hyperloop or whatever my vacuum tube magnetic levitation transportation system (VT-MLTS) ends up to be known as (I call it "kolej próżniowa" in Polish or vacuum train, Musk whom I solicited to write the white paper for me, calls it Hyperloop),

"Just as there exists a standard cargo container size that allows commercial ships and trucks to move cargo containers around, so should the commercial cargo vacuum tube magnetic levitation transportation system be standardized across all of European Union, Eurasian Economic Union, ASEAN and China." - Marcin Kubik

I thought about the cargo hyperloop some more and clearly if such a transportation system's tube is near vacuum, the cargo containers can simply sit on sleds, much as they are now moved around in Chinese and European ports, on driver-less robotic vehicles that slide under them without any cabin at all. Magnetic levitation in a vacuum is not limited and the technology can be improved to any desired velocity up to 10,000 km per hour. There doesn't need to be ANY pods.


Asia’s first automated container terminal, at Port of Qingdao, China should serve as a good example for the vacuum tube magnetic levitation transportation system. You don't need a truck with a cabin. You don't need a vehicle that encapsulates the container. All you need is a sled under the cargo container to make it levitate and move in the desired direction.

As I have explained before, the parcel vacuum tube magnetic levitation transportation system does not need to be container sized nor carry passengers. Articles that refer to the DP World Cargospeed pod as somehow "scaled down" are wrong.


a.) DP World Cargospeed is the correct size for parcel and mail transport

b.) DP World Cargospeed does require a pod as parcels and mail need to be packed into it

c.) DP World Cargospeed does not need to be in a complete vacuum so it needs a pod

"To sum up, VT-MLTS can come in three different cross sections: passenger, cargo and mail. Domestically for nation states that service their own mail and parcel carriers, the VT-MLTS solutions can be of any standard that fits the country." - Marcin Kubik

Internationally across Eurasia, a cargo VT-MLTS does not need to have pods, but does need to be standardized. If cargo contained within shipping containers can be damaged by depressurization inside the tube, the container can be covered up to prevent it or containers can be made air tight by sealing them. It is easier to seal or cover a shipping container than to build a system that needs to encapsulate each single one of them inside a pod.

"Despite travelling at speeds of up to 1,230 kph, designers say the effects on the human body of supersonic travel inside a vacuum tunnel will be minimal." The system will open in France. I find that fitting, considering that France is powered by nuclear fission, will be the first country to have nuclear fusion power, and is the hotbed of high speed rail.

"The trans-Eurasian VT-MLTS cargo and passenger solutions, in the long term will go even faster than 1,200 km per hour, and more importantly, they should and will incorporate superconducting power lines that will distribute solar electricity throughout Eurasia in addition to powering the transportation system." - Marcin Kubik




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hybrid Autonomous Mobile Drone Anti Tank Missile System

Trump's "Kill their families" vs. USA's WMD use, terrorism and war crimes

Hyperloop's Superiority as Compared to Airline Jet Travel